The gateway reports on itself
Every routing decision — which upstream, how many attempts, cache hit or miss — comes back on the response. Infrastructure you cannot inspect is infrastructure you cannot trust in an incident.
RouteMind AI Inc. builds one thing: the layer between an application and the model providers behind it. Not models, not agents, not another framework — the routing, retry, caching and accounting that every team ends up rewriting badly.
Every team that puts a model into production writes the same code twice. First the naive version: one provider, one key, one endpoint. Then the real version, six months later, after an outage — a retry loop, a second provider, a cache someone bolted on, and a spreadsheet reconciling the invoice against what the application thinks it spent.
RouteMind AI Inc. builds that second version once, properly, as infrastructure. A single endpoint in front of your providers, with routing, failover, caching and usage accounting as configuration rather than application code.
We are deliberately not in the model business. We do not train, host or fine-tune anything, and we have no opinion about which model you should use. That neutrality is the product: a gateway is only useful if it is indifferent to what sits behind it.
Every routing decision — which upstream, how many attempts, cache hit or miss — comes back on the response. Infrastructure you cannot inspect is infrastructure you cannot trust in an incident.
We hold what a feature requires and nothing more. Payloads are not retained by default, usage records carry counts rather than content, and nothing that passes through the gateway trains a model.
You bring your own provider accounts and keep your own agreements. Routes are configuration you can read, and the request shape is the one you already send — leaving is a base URL change.
Fields that have not been confirmed for publication are listed as pending rather than filled in.